Talk:Magic Kingdom

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Magic Kingdom article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 90 days

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Magic Kingdom. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Magic Kingdom at the Reference desk.

Disney Top‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Amusement Parks: Walt Disney Parks and Resorts High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Walt Disney Parks and Resorts task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Text and/or other creative content from Main Street, U.S.A. was copied or moved into Magic Kingdom with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Archives

Index

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

File:Partners and Cinderella.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Partners and Cinderella.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Partners and Cinderella.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:17, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cinderella Castle

I've marked the Cinderella Castle being a replica in the article as citation needed, as it's not true, but I'm not sure the correct way to go about removing it, as in if there's some delay I'm supposed to leave it. Anyone able to help me with that? ~Jason (talk) 06:33, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection

I wanted to nominate this page for pp-semi-protected classification due to the volume of recent vandalism. Anyone else in favor? Remember: "Semi-protection prevents a page from being edited by anonymous and newly registered users."^[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ihafez (talk • contribs) 02:26, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in favor, the article gets vandalized probably once a week and it's almost always bogus accounts. ms784 (talk) 14:33, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAT:SEMI

Former Lands

I deleted and removed this section, as it was not cited, had false information, and was riddled with spelling and grammar mistakes. I don't have time to clean it up right now, so unless someone else fixes it, it should stay as is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.95.48.112 (talk) 21:21, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1990s roller coaster renovation?

I've been expanding the article on Dynamic Structures and I was looking at how the firm entered into the amusement industry. According to their website, they were contacted by a "major North American theme park" to resolve problems with metal fatigue on a roller coaster. Trying to find out which ride and park it was, I came across this interview which says it was a ride at a Disney park in Florida. The only two roller coasters at Walt Disney World in the 1990s were Space Mountain and Big Thunder Mountain. So to anyone familiar with these rides, which of these rides received maintenance that would qualify as a "redesigned structure" in the 1990s? I've seen Space Mountain had a refurb in 1999, but I think that might be too late, considering Test Track and some of Dynamic Structures' other projects had already opened. Themeparkgc Talk 05:27, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Media Research and Analysis

This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 August 2024 and 2 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hazanv2 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Hazanv2 (talk) 00:36, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAT:SEMI

[1]