Talk:Cosmotheism

Semi-protection

As the page has been under constant attack by a string of anons, I've had to semi-protect it, as well as blocking all the anons who've been involved so far. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:57, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Discuss the Issue

Mel Etitis, why don't you discuss the fact that the term Cosmotheism predates the publication of Mordecai Neshinyahy's book. Do you personally believe that he "created the term"? If so why? Do you have any evidence? The term Cosmotheism predates both Neshinyahu and Pierce. The statement "Neshinyahu created the term" is not true. Let's keep the credibility of Wikipedia in tact, let's be truthful about the creation of the term "Cosmotheism". registerd user "Oklahoma"

1. Don't edit archives, as you did on my Talk page.
2. You've been blocked for a week as an anonymous editor, so your new account should also be blocked. Given that you're actually Paul Vogel, I'll in fact block it permanently as a disruptive sock-puppet used to evade a year-long ban.
3. Your claims about Mordecai Neshinyahy seem clearly to be a smokescreen. After trying repeatedly to turn this disambiguation page into a substitute article on Cosmotheism, when the original article had been deleted in line with an AfD, you started fiddling with the page to make a point. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 09:16, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

You are Wrong Again

1. Neshinyahy did not "create the term" Cosmotheism. 2. I am not Paul Vogel. 3. My calaims are not a "smokescreen" 4. I have not "repeatedly" tried to do anything, I edited the article one time. 5. You cannot prove that I am Paul Vogel or that I edited the article more than once, because neither are true.

I am interested in truth. Thank you, Oklahoma.

1. I don't believe you.
2. You haven't even bothered to look at the page. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 23:49, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

I'm Not Paul Vogel

I'm not Vogel, regardless if you believe me or not. I have looked at the page. Ask Will Beback, or look at my message to him on his talk page. How could you possibly know if I've looked at the page. Your arrogant presumptions appear to be boundless, and perhaps endless. I'm waiting with anticipation for the next baseless claim you stick upon me.

Hold your breath. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:24, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

That is right, he wasn't Paul Vogel, I am, and Mel the Dope is wrong yet again! LOL! :D What else isn't new?-PV http://www.cosmotheism.net and http://www.nationalvanguard.org AND http://nationalvanguard.org/2013/07/discovering-cosmotheism/

The Theology of Cosmotheism

At least the basic beliefs of Cosmotheists should be presented in the article, just as you might do with any other religion, whether mainstream of off-beat. I don't think that it is enough to present a summary description and the names of three people who are regarded as Cosmotheists. 50.110.120.107 (talk) 20:54, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

What is stopping you? 47.137.179.4 (talk) 16:35, 26 March 2023 (UTC)