Talk:Cecum

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Anatomy: Gross Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.

Cecum/colon

Please do not edit the cecum page. The contents are now in the page colon (anatomy). The content of the subsections of the colon were being duplicated and, of course, edits were not being propagated over all the articles. Kd4ttc 20:45, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Most sources do not consider the cecum to be part of the colon, so I have split the content back out onto its own page. --Arcadian 00:37, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Function

It's not clear at a glance what the cecum is actually the anus for from this article. I feel this needs to be clarified. Pika132 22:05, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is used to store food material in herbivores, where bacteria are able to break down the cellulose. In humans this no longer occurs (see vermiform appendix), so it's just a dead end pouch and part of the large intestine. Richard001 22:24, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

but what does it do

"most sources" (weasel words) btw what does this organ do

in humans it does not do very much - as mentiones some animals use it for digestion but men do not.

Title spelling

this s h ron information of what u v put so from nex time rea bok a lot n then put info where ok :)5.36.0.158 (talk) 11:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cecum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060715020910/http://learning.mgccc.cc.ms.us/science/cat/sld021.htm to http://learning.mgccc.cc.ms.us/science/cat/sld021.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:39, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

redirect of cecal to here

Two items. There is a redirect for cecal to go to the cecum article. In this case, cecal is used as an adjective, e.g., cecal carcinoid tumor. It's also used in ileocecal. But the user should really be given the choice to also choose Cecotrope. A hatnote could be used (rather than disambiguation) since there are only 2 relevant articles. In the disambiguation help file, it says to choose a Primary Topic. For the cecum article, the cecal term is used as a adjective. For the cecotrope article, it's a noun & cecal is another name for cecotrope so I was wondering if the cecotrope article should be the Primary Topic.

Item two; caecal also redirects to cecum, but that word is not used in the article. It's an alternative spelling to cecal but since it's not in the article, should it be a redirect to the Cecotrope article (which does contain the word caecal)?

Disclosure: I asked this on the Teahouse page, but did not get a complete answer so thought I would ask here. Sunandshade (talk) 06:02, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hearing no objections, I have made the specified changes. Sunandshade (talk) 19:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]