Talk:Libertarian perspectives on foreign intervention

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Libertarianism portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Mid-importance).

2004-2005 comments

The grammar of this page is so tortured that it's difficult to discern any meaning. To the extent that any meaning can be discerned, it appears to not be factually correct. This page should either be rewritten to be readable and true or it should be deleted. Mcarling 11 Jan 2004, 12:24 (UTC)

Maybe I am stupid, but I can't make any sense of this article at all. I can't even understand it enough to disagree with it. --pstudier 06:57, 2004 Feb 19 (UTC)

Looking at the article right now, I can't help but concur. The last edit seemed to be someone's attempt to clean it up, but the article seriously needs a complete overhaul. I might try my hand at it within the next few days. - Korpios 06:15, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:168.143.113.116 left this comment on the article page: I've left the rest of this article alone in case it makes sense to someone. Since he is the fourth person to indicate that he does not understand the article, I moved his comment here, deleted everything except what he added, and added the Stub notice. pstudier 23:04, 2005 Feb 7 (UTC)

If you're going to quote from pro-Israeli "Free Radical", then someone should quote Lew Rockwell or Sobran or some other anti-Zionist libertarian. It's my impression that the majority of Libertarians are anti-Zionist.

I'm not sure what your issue is. The Free Radical quote acknowledges both sides. I have no idea what Free Radical's opinions are on Israel. The quote says "Other libertarians believe that [Arabs] wouldn’t hate us enough to strap bombs if it weren’t for our outspoken support of Israel and presence in the region." I link to both Rockwell and Rand, which pretty much covers the whole spectrum. Dave 05:23, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC) (edited my post when I reread the objection)

54% of U.S. libertarians oppose American involvement overseas, and that 43% are in favor of it

Are the 43% really libertarians, then? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.228.159 (talk) 12:00, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Libertarian perspectives on foreign intervention. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:18, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

US-centric

This article either needs to be renamed "American libertarian perspectives on foreign intervention" or else globalised. BobFromBrockley (talk) 14:59, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Original research/primary sources

This article completely lacks secondary sources, making it basically original research. Are there secondary sources that can be drawn on? BobFromBrockley (talk) 15:00, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]