Talk:Stud poker

Gambling: Poker Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Poker (assessed as Low-importance).

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Opening comment

Note: Many of the poker pages were originally placed in the public domain, so their presence on other web sites, etc. does not necessarily indicate a copyright violation. See Talk:List_of_miscellaneous_poker_variants for discussion.

copyvio charge

An editor pointed out that our text was very similar to http://www.gambling-poker.com/stud_poker.html.

The Wayback Machine shows this page appearing in April 2003 [1].
Our wording was here much sooner [2].

More than likely, the other site stole our text without attribution. -- Netoholic @ 03:57, 2004 Nov 10 (UTC)

Blind Stud

Since stud poker is defined as a form of poker where a mixture of cards are dealt face-up AND face-down, how can 'blind stud' be considered a form of stud poker? There's either something wrong with the description of stud poker or the categorisation of 'blind stud'. The question is: which one?Erdles 22:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Added to Wikipedia Project Poker

Seeking outside opinions from Wikipedia project poker on whether or not the self-published playwinningpoker links should be included. I do not wish to engage in an edit war with User:2005 and I think User:2005 should cease editing the article until opinions from other editors can be obtained. DegenFarang (talk) 07:54, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do to the lack of response I have also added this to Project Gambling, Project Software and Project Computing (the last two because of my inclusion of a request for assistance on SNG Wizard DegenFarang (talk) 12:12, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sökö/ Scandinavian poker

No poker books or sites I've read mentions a three-card straight. I've stripped this from the article. --Full steam (talk) 17:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]