Talk:Neocolonialism

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Neocolonialism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Francisco Franco#Franco and the United States|Generalissimo Franco]] The anchor (#Franco and the United States) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2019 and 20 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Louange Mwajuma. Peer reviewers: Louange Mwajuma.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose to merge Neocolonial dependence into Neocolonialism. There are no sources in the former article and I fail to see why the content can't be covered in Neocolonialism. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 21:41, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If there's no sources, there's not much to merge. It could certainly fit here when there are sources (and even split back out in some later event). CMD (talk) 23:22, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Agree with CMD, just keep it for time being. 2001:8003:9008:1301:44D3:F319:5F79:31D7 (talk) 14:51, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Neocolonial" or "neo-colonial?"

This article uses both versions, seemingly interchangeably. May I (or could someone) change all instances to "neocolonial" (no hyphen) for the sake of maintaining a consistent style? Xanthos IV (talk) 21:40, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Technoculture 320-02

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Josalsan89 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Acarlos19.

— Assignment last updated by ACHorwitz (talk) 18:53, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism section

There are a lot of ways you could approach this and a lot of sources considered valid by wikipedia. 180.241.250.205 (talk) 01:37, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Internally inconsistent

Article credits both Kwame Nkrumah and Jean-Paul Sartre with coining the term. If this is a case of different sources saying different things, the two statements should be together and accompanied by more than the usual amount of sourcing Elinruby (talk) 10:07, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Other countries as examples

Russia and China should be mentioned and described like US is. Also Russia acts more like an old colonial empire, choosing mass murder and terror over economic influence, both its internal and foreign policies involve neocolonialism as it is described in the article. 109.87.36.102 (talk) 04:00, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Technoculture 320-01

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2024 and 10 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): SalvadorCSUF (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Lindaesco21.

— Assignment last updated by Bbalicia (talk) 00:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of Soviet Union/Russia

there's such an extensive section on the United States. why is there no such section for the Soviet Union or continued Russian Federation 2409:40E1:27:60E5:5896:FFFC:5A9:3435 (talk) 16:35, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@2409:40E1:27:60E5:5896:FFFC:5A9:3435 just wanted to add. I thought you all could have added more about China and some other countries too. their involvement in the affairs of other regions and how it plays to the dynamics of their own interests. I just felt that the article went too extensive on the details about the United States while the same could have been done for other countries too. not to take away from the section about America but same standard can be followed with the other sections too 2409:40E1:27:60E5:5896:FFFC:5A9:3435 (talk) 19:10, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Global Extractivism

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2024 and 10 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: BLC340, Username89713.

— Assignment last updated by Sancar27 (talk) 21:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

US foreign policy and the CIA

I suggest that the entire first paragraph of this section under "United States" should be removed. It is entirely about the book "The Invisible Government". And that might be relevant, except it does not cite the book in service to the topic of this section, but rather cites some professor's characterization of the thesis of the book, along with some epically awkward paraphrasing of comments by one of the authors about that book. Sarc3n (talk) 22:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]