Category talk:Flowers
Appearance
This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Category scope
[edit] – Section heading added by Undead Shambles (talk) 23:19, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
To avoid category-edit wars, since presumably century plant is not wanted here even though it has impressive flowers, I suggest that this document itself as "plants noted/grown/valued for their flowers" or some such. Stan 20:40, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Uh, yeah. some meaning for the category would be nice. Plantago lanceolata is tagged to this category... why? (I'll remove the tag if there is no objection).SB Johnny 21:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- I'd strongly recommend taking out all of the plant species (if not, it'll end up with thousands of articles), and limit it to pages on floral botany (pages like [Flower], [Petal], [Stamen], etc.) and other related pages like [Artificial flower]. - MPF 01:55, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- Good idea. — Pekinensis 23:44, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'd strongly recommend taking out all of the plant species (if not, it'll end up with thousands of articles), and limit it to pages on floral botany (pages like [Flower], [Petal], [Stamen], etc.) and other related pages like [Artificial flower]. - MPF 01:55, 4 June 2006 (UTC)