User talk:Squeemu

Cassell profile

Hi I saw your contribution the Sam Cassell discussion section. It appears that a particular member (I don't know his name as he never signs) has a personal crusade against references to the Cassell-Alien e-phenomenon. I really don't know how to go about resolving the matter as I'm relatively new to Wiki and never have had an experience with a member who is intent on asserting his/her will. Can you please review the situation and weigh in with your opinion?

Regards --Wayniac 10:27, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sucks to you

This is how you view my contributions

-Djgranados 20:17, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

dollar theatre?

to see crash this week? Djgranados 05:19, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Only if you contribute to another article.

Joy Electric

Why did you revert the edits made on the Joy Electric page? Did you even read the section you reinstated? squeemu

No, I didn't read the section, I just saw an alert by the bot in the vandalism channel, one of many, that there was a large blanking by an IP and reflexively reverted. Sorry. --Rory0 96 22:16, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

that was me, oh not logged in - frogcarpet, who did that. looks like darth katana x has given it a rest finally.

"Vandalism"

Please don't refer to my edits as "vandalism", as you did here. You may have noticed that I asked on the talk page if anyone objected to a redirect, and nobody has responded. If you disagree with the redirect, that's fine, but I'd like to hear why on the talk page. Friday (talk) 19:16, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see your reply now- simple mistake, no worries. Friday (talk) 19:17, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Core Concepts

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Core Concepts, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.144.21.201 19:46, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Core Concepts

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Core Concepts, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.144.21.201 19:47, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Biological issues in Jurassic Park for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Biological issues in Jurassic Park is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biological issues in Jurassic Park (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Barsoomian (talk) 18:02, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Brian staveley

Hi, I've moved this to a draft page so you have longer to work on it without it being at risk of deletion. It can now be found Brian staveley|here. If you need any help moving it back when its ready drop me a message on my talk page. Amortias (T)(C) 21:12, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]