Talk:Bryter Layter

Fair use rationale for Image:Bryter Layter (remastered).jpg

Image:Bryter Layter (remastered).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:17, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bryter Layter (back).jpg

Image:Bryter Layter (back).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:17, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction/Present tense

This album still exists, it can be bought, the "was" in the introduction is therefore wrong, if nobody is agaist it I'll change it in a couple of days Trufetes (talk) 23:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zathura.

Where in 'Zathura' is Fly mentioned, as said in the article? -65.12.134.148 (talk) 23:24, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Review on all albums

This review is on all 3 Nick Drake album wiki pages, probably incorrectly. Alternative Press (March 2001, p.88) - "With a voice paradoxically feather-light and grave, [one] of the most beautiful and melancholy albums ever recorded." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.146.32.9 (talk) 00:26, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Performers

Am I the only one who hears no bass or drums on "Introduction"?Cbben (talk) 15:36, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Folk jazz"

Further developments occurred during the seventies, as evidenced in albums like Nick Drake's Bryter Layter (Wikipedia: Article Jazz Folk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.19.174.71 (talk) 17:42, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So you're referencing a Wikipedia article (contravening WP:CIRCULAR) which itself has no verifiable references that Bryter Layter should be included in this genre? Richard3120 (talk) 18:29, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bryter Layter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:01, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Checked. Richard3120 (talk) 01:08, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]