User talk:Secant

User Page

You should move the above information to your user page and remove it from your talk page. WAvegetarian 20:41, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Good idea. i will try that. User:Secant 19:46, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:British_Empire_anachronous.png

Thanks for uploading Image:British_Empire_anachronous.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

I forgot that, I created the map and that is where the source comes from.User:Secant 20:26, 13 Aug 2006 (UTC)

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 10:57, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:British Empire anachronous.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:British Empire anachronous.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 09:53, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for participation in Asperger FARC

As a member of Wiki Aspergians, I hope you'll comment on the Asperger's FARC. I am voting to de-list, as I believe the article has taken a drastic POV shift toward pure pathology and away from the dual nature - talent+disability - articulated by the leading RS's of the field. I hope you'll vote whether you agree or not with my assessment :

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_review#Asperger_FARC_commentary CeilingCrash 19:21, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for participation in Asperger FARC

As a member of Wiki Aspergians, I hope you'll comment on the Asperger's FARC. I am voting to de-list, as I believe the article has taken a drastic POV shift toward pure pathology and away from the dual nature - talent+disability - articulated by the leading RS's of the field. I hope you'll vote whether you agree or not with my assessment :

     http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_review#FARC_commentary_10

CeilingCrash 19:23, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]