Talk:Kelvinhall subway station

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit / in UK / in Scotland Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Transport in Scotland.

Untitled

Delete There is no way this stub can be turned into an encyclopedic entry. The underground station in question is just a single island platform up an alley. It wrongly states that it is the best station for Glasgow University, this is actually Hillhead. Its only claim to notability is that it is the station for the Kelvin Hall, but that doesn't even make it the most notable station on the Glasgow Underground, this point could be put in the main article. If this is notablity we will end up with entries for most of the underground stations in central London and other cities. PatGallacher 21:00, 2005 Jan 30 (UTC)(talk)

Votes for deletion results

This page was listed on votes for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Glasgow Kelvinhall for the results of the debate. -- AllyUnion (talk) 13:04, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Infobox FAIL

How could the station be opened in the same year as its renaming?; surely, it was opened much earlier than 1977. Kevin Steinhardt (talk) 19:32, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shown in the photograph...

I have removed a piece of text which referred to a photograph that no longer appears to be in the article. Dunarc (talk) 10:27, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]