Talk:CA Anti-Spyware

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 August 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer Security.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

I have listed this article for deletion as spam. The request was voted down because it is about a notable piece of software. The article still needs to be rewritten - at the moment it is little more than an advertisement. - Mike Rosoft 15:25, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

from Vfd

On 23 Feb 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep and cleanup. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/PestPatrol for a record of the discussion.

As I wote this piece, I just wanted people to understand that this is not designed to be an advertisement, and I don't work for Pestpatrol. I wanted Pestpatrol to have an article, since it is one of the most historically-important antispyware vendors. Everything I say about Pestpatrol is true, including the fact that it is controversial.

I find it important in an encyclopedia article to make it clear:

why something is important (in case it should appear in an unusual context like in a novel years from now)
if it is controversial
what other vendors have used it
background information
notable contributions to an industry

If this sounds like an ad, perhaps it hasn;t met my requirements.

Smkatz 13:14, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

P.S I am also a contributing author to a very comprehensive list of spyware vendors on Wikipedia.

These links have been spammed in a very awful way. They no longer go to CA or Pestpatrol. I am fixing this.

Smkatz 13:21, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Since I have waited for a response for three days, I am changing the cleanup tag to remove the rewrite requirement. I do not as I said work for Pestpatrol, CA, or any other company. I am a college student. My recent work on the US Cellular article proves that I am a credible contributor to wikipedia. Anyone who thinks I have violated Wikipedia rules by making this change, which I think will cause this article to be improved faster, may e-mail me at katzsa [at] earlham dot edu

--Sam Smkatz 11:37, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I have read the discussion on Vfd. More people want a "cleanup" than a "cleanup" rewrite. It gets 805,000 google hits which means that it is referenced at least 42 places on the web. (Googlebombing requires at least 42 references.)

By the general consensus governance style of Wikipedia, and the general lack of progress on this artiicle, my actions were appropriate.

Smkatz 11:42, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Link to pestcan or pestscan (?) does not work. Dthomsen8 (talk) 01:52, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on CA Anti-Spyware. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:10, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sunmist3 (talk) 23:34, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on CA Anti-Spyware. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071217062755/http://community.ca.com/blogs/securityadvisor/archive/2007/11/29/facebook-s-misrepresentation-of-beacon-s-threat-to-privacy-tracking-users-who-opt-out-or-are-not-logged-in.aspx to http://community.ca.com/blogs/securityadvisor/archive/2007/11/29/facebook-s-misrepresentation-of-beacon-s-threat-to-privacy-tracking-users-who-opt-out-or-are-not-logged-in.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:50, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]