Talk:Classical conditioning
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Classical conditioning article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
similar pages, combine?
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conditioning and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_conditioning seem to be the same subject
Yeah, I noticed the same thing.
The Conditioning page is now just disambiguation, and should link to both classical and operant. I think it's fine, currently (10/11/06).
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class psychology articles
- Top-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- C-Class Russia articles
- Mid-importance Russia articles
- Mid-importance C-Class Russia articles
- C-Class Russia (science and education) articles
- Science and education in Russia task force articles
- WikiProject Russia articles