Talk:What Is Art?

Philosophy: Literature / Aesthetics Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Aesthetics

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Is this sufficiently detailed? Is it a good article? I'm new here, and I'm trying to be helpful, so go easy on me, but I'm trying to see if this is good.

Lydgate 22:11, Apr 13, 2004 (UTC)

The sentence in paragraph two which starts out "Tolstoy addition to previously..." seems a little unclear, perhaps just a grammatical mistake or missing a word. I corrected wide to widen and compeling to compelling. My question is that what is art??

u cant know lololol —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.112.113.132 (talk) 01:04, 17 September 2008 (UTC) Art doesnt need to be beatiful[reply]

Critical reception?

Apparently the public were greatly disappointed at this work, felt to be unworthy of such a great author. There should be some reference to this. Valetude (talk) 10:16, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Precisely who was apparently (seemingly, ostensibly) greatly disappointed? Who felt it to be apparently unworthy of such a great author? Since we are dealing with subjective points of view, I might add mine: This book by Tolstoy is enormously important and of inestimable value.96.248.101.32 (talk) 19:27, 7 April 2018 (UTC)DeMikeal Bivins[reply]

The empty sections

What are these empty sections? Do they correspond to the sections of the book? Valetude (talk) 10:18, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

English

E 41.210.141.129 (talk) 18:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Science 2022

What is blood 45.215.220.123 (talk) 06:00, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]