Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unioctave Divalet
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was author requested speedy. Tony Sidaway|Talk 21:52, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was author requested speedy. Tony Sidaway|Talk 21:52, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete, my apologies, I was merely trying to defend Ashanti and define a term I've held used around in Atlanta. It was better for the Wiktionary anyway. If you all disagree, then feel free to kill it. Antares33712 18:22, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neologism for a singer with a limited range. Google=0. —Wahoofive (talk) 00:32, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, neologism coined by the author. --bainer (talk) 01:42, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Unwieldly and illogical neologism. Geogre 03:48, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Looks like an unverifiable term. Thus, neologism. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:30, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, neologistic phrase. Megan1967 06:38, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Zero Google hits: [1] --Blackcats 07:04, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete drini ☎ 02:48, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.