Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Requests for commentRichardchilton

Get rid of this page. The existence of this page is a red herring. So what if these users are the same person? None of the users listed is a banned matter, so this is a non-issue. (unsigned but was listed on vfd by 172)

Move to that user's userpage. Alcarillo 19:58, 6 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I have much respect for the people arguing over this case, but my sporadic interactions with Richard Chilton et al. have suggested he is more interested in yanking chains than in helping improve WP. Can you point to some good, productive edits he has made? +sj + 01:17, 2004 May 7 (UTC) Also, repeated denial of pup ownership can in itself be reason for keeping open an RfC page. +sj +
Were the standard guidelines followed prior to making this page? If they were, then keep. --Jia ng 02:09, 7 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]