Talk:Crittenden–Johnson Resolution

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on July 25, 2018 and July 25, 2021.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States History Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject United States History To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention
Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes
Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs
Other :
- Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess:
  - {{WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}}
  - {{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}}

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) thing(s).

Should the actual text of the resolution be corrected for errors? That is, are misspellings and grammatical errors in the original, or errors unique to Wikipedia? Wmahan . 04:18, 2004 Apr 15 (UTC)

This interpretation is highly POV, and blatantly an attempt to prove that the American Civil War was not about slavery. It needs a better discussion of the political context, particularly the political calculus of maintaining control of the upper South, not to mention the close relationship between slavery and secession. The errors are of omission.

On the vote see Congressional Globe, 37th Congress, 1st session, pp. 223 and 265. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Megnal (talk • contribs) 04:11, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Missouri and Kentucky

Once again we pretend Missouri and Kentucky didn't secede.

Wikipedia is consistent, if not factually correct. 98.101.227.58 (talk) 01:34, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shifting sentiment

Is it just me, or does the body of the article only explain how it "passed almost unanimously in July" and not how "it was defeated by a decisive majority in December"? DAVilla (talk) 04:23, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]