Talk:Nancy Pearl

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

United States: Washington / Seattle Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle.

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lesbian??

Is Ms Pearl a lesbian? -- Jmabel | Talk 07:42, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.240.200.7 (talk)

Tribute band??

Does anyone have a verifiable source on that tribute band thing? If it's true, I think it is very cool, but unsourced and added anonymously, I've got my doubts. -- Jmabel | Talk 07:42, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)

It is certainly true, although verification could prove embarrassing for the participants. (anonymously posted)

Hmm. Like was there any show poster, or coverage anywhere? I'm asking because this is the kind of thing that is sheer hell for someone to document afterwards when fact-checking an article. -- Jmabel | Talk 06:06, Dec 23, 2004 (UTC)

when I did the most recent update I was seriously considering getting rid of that. it's a cute little side note but with no verification and not even some more source material, it rings very un-encyclopedic. -- Jessamyn

tribute band

Would a photograph be enough verification, do you think?

sure, or a flyer or something. it's getting a little silly though and changing the text to read that the show was "quite an experience" is verging on lacking NPOV for something that lacks any media coverage at all. I'm sure it was delightful, and yet it's very very tangentially relevant to the subject in the first place. Got a picture? show it off. Jessamyn 03:25, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Citations

I cited for the obvious here, but (among other things) her early life and her daughters' names need citation. - Jmabel | Talk 00:05, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nancy Pearl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061117085731/http://booklust.wetpaint.com/ to http://www.booklust.wetpaint.com/
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://interviews.lisnews.org/article.pl?sid=05%2F08%2F08%2F1918226
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061208081947/http://www.habitsofwaste.wwu.edu/issues/7/iss7art3b.shtml to http://www.habitsofwaste.wwu.edu/issues/7/iss7art3b.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:42, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]