Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Laughlin (actor)
Tom Laughlin (actor) was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep
New article written in 1st person about actor of questionable notability. Ðåñηÿßôý | Talk 18:47, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete, list on requested articles. Star of Billy Jack. Current article on Laughlin is just a review of the movie, though, and contains no information about him.— Gwalla | Talk 19:42, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)- The actor was notable enough, at least in the United States, for his own article
but this one is just lousy. Delete.Fire Star 19:47, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)- Much better. Change to keep. Fire Star 21:51, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- I rewrote it, hope it's worth keeping now. I vote Keep. RickK 19:49, Sep 26, 2004 (UTC)
- The rewrite looks good. I'm gonna have One Tin Soldier stuck in my head for a few days now. Keep. Spatch 20:21, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. This article is worth keeping now after the rewrite. -- J3ff 23:08, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, thanks to RickK's work. JamesMLane 06:59, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete [[User:Rex071404|Rex071404
]] 20:39, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC) - Keep. Why do you want to delete it, Rex? RickK did a good job rewriting this, and it's a notable actor. Guanaco 21:03, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Smerdis of Tlön 11:31, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Love the rewrite. Dieter Simon 00:45, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Keep I see no need to delete--ScottyBoy900Q∞ 18:17, 04 Oct 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.