Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theory of the Beginning
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 15:39, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Appears to be one person's view. Xcali 04:39, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. POV essay. Time is a non-existent force... okay... AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 04:52, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Megan1967 05:21, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Essay. And such eloquent phraseology too: "Both theories have a wide range of supporters who are willing to bash their opponent's heads in." Eric119 05:36, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Personal essay. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:39, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Personal essay, POV. Tobycat 05:42, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Original research. --Angr/tɔk tə mi 05:43, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Deep thoughts. (Besides, isn't time motion?) Geogre 11:14, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Essay. Sjakkalle 11:54, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for reasons above. Linuxbeak | Desk 12:17, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Mildly incoherent rhapsodizing. Trying to define time is an excercise in futility.
- Delete. POV, original research. Kaibabsquirrel 20:16, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. An essay. Not even a good one. GregorB 20:19, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. POV essay. Wikibofh 23:55, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Lacks coherency.
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.