Jump to content

Talk:Workers' Party (France, 1991–2008)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I rewrote many of the facts that I presented in the original version of the article. Would you be so kind as NOT to overwrite them with some automated translation of some PT presentation? David.Monniaux 13:34, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Would people be so kind as NOT to remove information from this article without at least discussing their motivations on the talk page? This is especially true of anonymous users. David.Monniaux 10:02, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)

The reference to the the PT as trotskyist has been deleted for reason that it is not. At least that is not the case formally and as the entry also comments that the PT is generally held to be a front for the OCI there is no need to describe it as trotskyist. Reference to the PT doing entrist work in Force Ouvriere has been deleted as the concept of entrism refers to work within political formations not to long term work within trades unions of which the members of PPT are legitimate members.

This entire article is a hit piece against its subject, and socialists in particular. Could somebody with enough expertise please revise it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.231.61.225 (talkcontribs) 05:28, 11 March 2006

I am a socialist, and I don't think this is really an attack. The Lambertists have generally been known for their creation of political intrigue (including sending members covertly into the Parti Socialiste). I think perhaps it could be reworded slightly and expanded, but it's for the most part accurate. --metzerly 18:19, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]

Support. The title "Workers' Party" is less awkward than "Party of the Workers", and the French Parti des Travailleurs can be accurately translated as "Workers' Party". Further, its Algerian counterpart is listed on Wikipedia under Workers' Party (Algeria). --metzerly 18:22, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing no objections, the move has been done. I plan to also expand the article in the near future if no one else does so. --metzerly 23:35, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]