Jump to content

Talk:Interstate 294

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled comments

[edit]

Proposed interchange on I-294 and I-57?

In 1999, authorities had a proposal of building an interchange on Interstate 294. do explain please...

Should be addressed. ---Rob 18:10, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

The northern end of Interstate 294 is IN Deerfield, not Northbrook. Someone should correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.26.30.5 (talk) 05:46, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or not?

[edit]

Should we merge this article with Tri-State Tollway; or keep it as a seperate page. I'm weakly opposing on merge because it has its own history to keep as a seperate page.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 20:06, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Interstate 294

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Interstate 294's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "tollwaymap":

  • From Jane Addams Memorial Tollway: Illinois State Toll Highway Authority, System Map, November 2007
  • From Tri-State Tollway: System Map (Map). Illinois State Toll Highway Authority. November 2007. Retrieved 2008-03-05. {{cite map}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 22:31, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Orphan refs fixed. BryanG (talk) 22:25, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Berkeley

[edit]

I-294 does not hit US 20 in Berkeley. I think rather that it's Northlake. Someone should correct that. 99.56.13.119 (talk) 19:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interstate 294. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:21, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Route Description

[edit]

Yes, there is a expanded route description, however, there are no references. Without any refereneces, it won't count as expansion. Thanks to @Imzadi1979 for corrections.

Cilabsuhsk (talk) 03:14, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]