User talk:Dscos/archive2
May 2004
[edit]Nirvana Discography
[edit]Your change to the discography for Nirvana was unneeded. It looks neater in table form, making it easier to read than the somewhat messy format that you picked. It would be for the best to keep it as a table for the sake of the readers. -- LGagnon
26th century
[edit]We don't have an ordr years in the 100'sinal for 0 in English. The century of years prior to 100 is the first century. The century fo is the second. The 26th century is thus the years 2500 to 2599, and the 27th century 2600 to 2699. Why did you change the re-direct?? 66.32.87.120 01:37, 24 May 2004 (UTC)
- I'm afraid you're mistaken; The last year of a century is always the year ending in 00. The first century AD was 1 through 100, not 0 through 99. because there was no 0 AD. The 26th century page says itself: "The 26th century (Gregorian Calendar) comprises the years 2501-2600." Hence 2600 should redirect to 26th century, not 27th. blankfaze | ♫ 01:55, 24 May 2004 (UTC)
Admin
[edit]I'm hesitant to support anybody who's only been around about a month and a half. I think you should wait till three months. You'd get a lot of opposition of you tried it now. RickK
Robert Kyle Wilson
[edit]I am offended at your lack of taste. Mr. Wilson is a talented poet, as evidenced by his numerous speaking engagements across the midwest.
He is a poet and you can quote it.
E. Buell Denison University