Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Episcopal School of Dallas

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 02:59, May 23, 2005 (UTC)

Episcopal School of Dallas

Non-notable, delete. Neutrality^talk 13:43, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

Keep - has potential. Lupin 14:05, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Damn, more cute cheerleaders. Love those costumes with the gladiator hems! --Tony Sidaway|Talk 14:18, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep schools in wikipedia. --Howrealisreal 14:36, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, vanity - but nominator should be warned for WP:POINT. R adiant _* 15:03, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
Keep, as with all the others. - SimonP 15:05, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
~~Delete~~, does not establish itself to me the novice reader. ~~Master Thief Garrett 15:16, 17 May 2005 (UTC)~~ Still doesn't establish itself, but Merge into applicable area. Master Thief Garrett 07:29, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete horny wikipedians aside, this is nonnotable, and probable vanity. --InShaneee 15:18, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notable. Kappa 16:09, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Consolidate into article on area private schools, or else keep. — RJH 16:24, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Longhair | Talk 17:05, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, expand and echo Radiant. Too many nominated at once to expand all at once. Secondary schools are notable. --BaronLarf 20:14, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
Keep R Calvete 20:20, 2005 May 17 (UTC)
Delete. Useless collection of generic facts about an insignificant school. This is not an encyclopedia article. Individual schools are not inherently encyclopedic and there is nothing to distinguish insignificant schools like this one from thousands of nearly identical schools around the world. Gamaliel 20:29, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the school articles. Christopher Parham 21:15, 2005 May 17 (UTC)
Keep the schoolcruft. Ketsuban has spoken. The debate is over. 21:23, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Bogus (non-policy) mass nomination, clogging the VFD system - notability is still not a listed deletion criterion - David Gerard 23:20, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable. The text, "current headmaster is xxxxx" is an all too common failing of these articles on insignificant schools. Without providing a date, it's useless. Quale 00:06, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Dallas or with the appropriate (arch)diocese per my school article policy. Kelly Martin 02:22, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
Delete or transwiki to wikischools then delete. Gmaxwell 05:09, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Verifiable and NPOV. Schools are an excellent entry point for new Wikipedians. --Unfocused 14:33, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Introduce a limit of 3 nominations per day. CalJW 18:52, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete = not notable. NoAccount 03:00, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. We don't even have a policy about schools yet, schools are important, and this massive deletion campaign is terrible. Introduce a limit of 3 vfd nominations per day. Project Schoolwatch. --Zantastik 22:21, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.