Talk:Congo Free State

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Congo Free State article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2: 365 days

Congo Free State is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 20, 2004.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 19, 2004	Featured article candidate	Promoted
October 4, 2007	Featured article review	Demoted

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 5, 2007, February 5, 2009, and February 5, 2010.

Current status: Former featured article

Africa: DRC High‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Democratic Republic of the Congo portal This article is supported by WikiProject Democratic Republic of the Congo (assessed as Top-importance).

Former countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles

Belgium Mid‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Diseases

The third paragraph of the lead mentions "deaths caused by the exploitation and the lack of immunity to new diseases introduced by contact with European colonists". This is reffed to the Oxford History of Africa. I don't have access to that source, so I can't check if that's what it really says -- but the diseases that felled so many of the Africans were endemic, not introduced. The population's vulnerability was due not to European introduction, but to the chaos, malnutrition, and exhaustion resulting from the European regime. -- Elphion (talk) 20:51, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned table

Midofe1996 (talk · contribs) added an irrelevant table with no context; I have reverted this. Midofe1996 has added this table (against concensus) several times at Atrocities in the Congo Free State. See Talk:Atrocities in the Congo Free State/Archive 1#Orphaned table for the discussion at that article. Most of the points raised there apply here as well. -- Elphion (talk) 00:17, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why irrelevant? This table is totally documented Midofe1996 (talk) 01:12, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As explained at Talk:Atrocities in the Congo Free State/Archive 1#Orphaned table -- Elphion (talk) 14:26, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The table has been removed again. Midofe1996 (talk) has still not given any indication why the table is relevant. -- Elphion (talk) 20:43, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

pictures Economy during Leopold's rule

"Mining by the company Union Minière du Haut Katanga" is a picture of 1922, not Congo Free State but Belgian Congo, it could be used in the Belgian Congo article, but should be removed here Dubito, ergo cogito, ergo sum (talk) 17:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the photos are most likely from ca 1922. They appear in a 1922 periodical touting progress in the Katanga mining operation, so although undated, they are likely from shortly before publication. The Commons description of the photos dates them to 1891, but I suspect that date comes from the text "Established in 1891" prominently displayed just below the banner of the periodical. The links in the Commons description supporting the 1891 date are completely unhelpful. I've updated the Commons description accordingly. -- Elphion (talk) 18:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Current map? Why?

Why is the picture of the map of the Congo Free State a map of the now current Democratic Republic of the Congo? For example, German Togoland (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Togoland) shows a map that’s of the world during that time. Can we get a new map put in that’s of the Congo Free State? TheGoldenPickaxe (talk) 18:07, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I could make a map based on this raster image, I’d probably finish it by next week.

Sprucecopse (talk) 23:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That would be amazing! Thanks so much! TheGoldenPickaxe (talk) 15:17, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That would be great but I don't think that Belgium should be highlighted in the new map as it is in the raster image since the Congo Free State wasn't a colony of Belgium. Zoocat56 (talk) 23:04, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That’s true, though it is in essence Belgium’s slice of the African cake. I can understand why they highlighted it, they share the same head of state. Maybe a lighter shade of green could be used for Belgium as to denote its indirect relation to the state? Sprucecopse (talk) 23:44, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with using a different shade to indicate the personal union between the two states. That's a good idea. Zoocat56 (talk) 06:19, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the draft of the map, it's taken from a 1923 projection so if anything is off please let me know. I have to say that I wish Belgium was more visible. Perhaps a thick green circle could encircle Belgium for added emphasis and clear view?@TheGoldenPickaxe, @Zoocat56

Sprucecopse (talk) 18:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Orthographic_Globe_Map_of_the_Congo_Free_State.svg Sprucecopse (talk) 18:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In term of the borders it would be better to base the map on the GEA map showing the German possesions. @Sprucecopse Zoocat56 (talk) 19:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I could try but the GEA map is giving me issues in Illustrator for some reason. Sprucecopse (talk) 19:42, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not responding sooner. I like how the map looks and agree that Belgium could maybe be highlighted by a lighter green. TheGoldenPickaxe (talk) 16:45, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i just noticed this Yowazzup8282 (talk) 15:46, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]