Talk:The Great Rock 'n' Roll Swindle

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Film: British

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Coined

The Great Rock 'n' Roll Swindle was not coined by Jello Biafra it was the title of a "rockumentary" produced by Malcolm McLaren about his vision of the Sex Pistols,and their story it was released in 1979 and has an accompanied soundtrack released in the same year under the same title.

It would therefore have been impossible for Jello to coin this term in the mid 90's

I agree - do you fancy changing the article? Secretlondon 19:51, Dec 27, 2003 (UTC)

On VHS

The film got a home video release long before 1993, I hired it from my local video shop in about 1984. --SimonUK 15:20, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sting

"However, Sting, bassist and lead singer of the band, The Police has a bit part."

No he doesn't. He's only in out-takes, not the finished film.

Starkers

"The film also features copious amounts of full-frontal nudity (both male and female)."

Copious? Hardly.

And the above poster is right about VHS release dates. I have it on VHS here from 1982 (Virgin Video) in one of those old "big" VHS library cases. Sting has a bit part as a gay musician — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.147.165.58 (talk) 14:49, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sex Pistols - Swindle.jpg

Image:Sex Pistols - Swindle.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Swindle.jpg

Image:Swindle.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:13, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Swindle.jpg

Image:Swindle.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Swindle.jpg

Image:Swindle.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:21, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Greatrars.jpg

Image:Greatrars.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Russ

In his autobiography, John Lydon (Johnny Rotten) alleges that Russ Meyer was slated to direct, and had even started filming, before he was replaced by Julien Temple. Maikel (talk) 08:33, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah its true Russ Meyer did that, there is a Jonathan Ross The Incredibley Strange Film Show programme made for Channel 4 in UK where he interviews Meyer about it, don't know if it's on You Tube or not. the footage features the guy who plays BJ in the Temple film shooting Bambi with a crossbow if I recall correctly. The original title of the film was to be 'Who Killed Bambi?', as you probably know. The original script written by Roger Ebert(originally titled Anarchy in the UK) was to play like a punk version of the Beatles film Help! (1964), filming lasted two days before production was halted due to financial problems. There is a full transcript of Roger Ebert's script on Eberts blog page if you wanna read it, hope this is of some help? Also see wikipedia page Who Killed Bambi? 1978 film81.111.126.82 (talk) 01:01, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did the Great Rock'n'Roll Swindle movie make any money?

Usually these Wikipedia film sites tell you how much a movie cost to make and how much money it made. This Wikipedia site has a biased P.O.V. that implies only Malcolm McClaren would have made money and publicity out of the movie. 10:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.94.57.122 (talk)

Martin Boorman?!?!?

The 'so-called' Martin Boorman in the movie (uncredited in this article(don't know why), who played along with Steve Jones, Paul Cook and Ronnie Biggest, singing Biggs' rendition of 'Belsen was a Gas' in Brazil, could NO WAY have been the REAL Martin Boorman, as the real Martin Boorman's remains were found in GERMANY a number of years after the end if World War II....ANOTHER con, Malcom(R.i.P)? 2A00:23C5:DF17:A201:4835:90FF:FEA7:ECEC (talk) 00:09, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well no the Martin Boorman actor is a Russ Meyer thing see his film Supervixens for example