User talk:Metron
Disambiguation link notification for October 5
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blumenthal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomingdale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:25, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 23
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karlovy Vary, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages German and Czech (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for January 18
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Baier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bajer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Please read edits comments before revert
[edit]The content has already been moved to the relevant article. Yug (talk) 16:47, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 31
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heinz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rheinpfalz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Dear Metron, you've made some edits to Afroasiatic languages where you assert that Omotic is widely disputed. First, I want to point your attention to the fact that you did not provide a source for this claim, which would certainly be necessary to support the edits. Secondly, it is also not clear as to what exactly is disputed about Omotic. I know that there has been discussion about the internal integrity of the Omotic branch, such as the inclusion of the South Omotic languages. Others have asserted that Omotic is really just a branch of the Cushitic languages, and called it West Cushitic (this discussion came to an end in the late 1970s). I think only a minority of scholars ever doubted that the Omotic languages are part of the Afroasiatic phylum, and certainly the consensus among Chushiticists and Omotocicists is that Omotic languages do belong into the Afroasiatic phylum, however the micro-classification works out. With all this in mind, I kindly request that you provide sources to your claim, and that you clarify your claim. If you cannot do this, I instead request that you revert your edits regarding Omotic and restore the state of the page according to the previous consensus among the editors. Landroving Linguist (talk) 16:41, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – bradv🍁 22:01, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
The article Harbi (Islamic law) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Extremely inadequate sourcing - page is almost entirely the product of a defense college masters thesis, with some trivial secondary sourcing on minor points to theological works.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iskandar323 (talk) 08:31, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Harbi (Islamic law) for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harbi (Islamic law) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.