Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pat Healy
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 09:23, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable 5-time champion on Jeopardy. Set no major records either. Basically, the only way Healy would deserve an article if all 200 5-time champs since 1984 also got an article. --OntarioQuizzer 03:24, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Even as a long-time Jeopardy! fan, I can't see why he deserves his own article (even if it were to be rewritten into a full article). He's relatively non-notable. ral315 03:36, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. There's 144 people competing in the Ultimate Tournament of Champions; we don't need an article on every one of them. Recreate the article if he wins the tournament. Dave6 05:13, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- I'm glad someone else spotted this, Delete--nixie 05:34, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Yes,
delete. And keep an eye out for articles on all 144 contestants that may turn up in the next few weeks. -R. fiend 05:48, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)- The funny thing is that Healy's U-ToC game date has not even been announced yet. Also, this does not seem to be an isolated incident from this user (See Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/The_Story_Of_MY_Life). Should be interesting to see him defend notability on Pat Healy. --OntarioQuizzer 13:09, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable enough yet. Maybe later. Zzyzx11 05:56, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. I was going to suggest including him in a possible list of Jeopardy! Ultimate Tournament of Champions contestants, but I see he's already there. --Deathphoenix 06:32, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Well, then a guess a redirect there would be fine. Does that page seem a bit like overkill to anyone else though? -R. fiend 07:29, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Which one? Healy? Or U-ToC? --OntarioQuizzer 12:56, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- To clarify, redirect Healy to UToC. (Or delete. Either is fine with me). and the UToC page seems a bit like overkill. Not quite the sort of thing I'd expect from Everyking if it involved Ashlee Simpson, but getting close. -R. fiend 16:13, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Which one? Healy? Or U-ToC? --OntarioQuizzer 12:56, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Well, then a guess a redirect there would be fine. Does that page seem a bit like overkill to anyone else though? -R. fiend 07:29, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable outside of a game show. Megan1967 08:34, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable. Trilobite (Talk) 10:44, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. EggplantWizard 17:25, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete or redirect, in that order of preference. I think redirection is a little charitable in this case, but I'm willing to go for it if other folks are. BenSamples 04:33, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Question If I make a article for every person who is a 5 time Jeopardy winner can we keep Pat Healy?
- Answer No. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:27, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete: nonnotable game show contestant. Wile E. Heresiarch 03:56, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Jayjg (talk) 05:26, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.