User talk:Kevin Saff

Archives

It was time to clear this out, so I made /Archive 1 for ya. -- Kevin Saff (talk) 16:27, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RinkWorks

Well, if my cuts were drastic, so was your reversal! I'll gladly take the Dialectizer and anything else--as long as I don't have to take someone's word for its importance. The article is sorely lacking in encyclopedicness; if the notability of these sections are referenced via inline citations, that would be a different matter, of course. Thanks for keeping me posted, Drmies (talk) 02:25, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck poking around. Drmies (talk) 03:23, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please Return to Simple English Wikipedia

Hello Kevin Saff! We at Simple English Wikipedia would like to invite you to return to being the valued editor that you once were here. Simple English Wikipedia is a thriving and useful Wikimedia project that has grown to include over 55,000 articles. Whatever the reasons why you left, we'd like you to consider returning to our community. Simple English Wikipedia is a closely knit community where editors get to know each other and act as a real community. We would like to invite you to take a look at what we've become! Thank you for your former contributions to our project and please consider rejoining our family! Thank you! fr33k man -s- 06:05, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:RinkWorks

Sorry the accidental revert - hope it didn't cause any unnecessary stress... The article has been significantly improved (great job!) and I have voted Keep on the xfd page. - Fastily (talk) 06:05, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:FCC-logo.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:FCC-logo.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:55, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:20 mule team wagons.jpeg

File:20 mule team wagons.jpeg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:20 mule team wagons.jpeg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:20 mule team wagons.jpeg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 17:25, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santa Barbara, California-painting of mission.gif is now available as Commons:File:Santa Barbara, California-painting of mission.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:50, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carbon cycle-flux diagram.jpeg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Carbon cycle-flux diagram.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:47, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carbon cycle-soil processes.jpeg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Carbon cycle-soil processes.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:47, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santa Barbara, California-oil derricks on the beach in 1900.jpeg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Santa Barbara, California-oil derricks on the beach in 1900.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 09:14, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carbon cycle-flux diagram.jpeg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Carbon cycle-flux diagram.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mancala 2x6 plus 2

Template:Mancala 2x6 plus 2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:41, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's been moved to User: Kevin Saff/Mancala 2x6 plus 2. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:37, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Merritt Parkway-mainline in Fairfield County.jpeg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Merritt Parkway-mainline in Fairfield County.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 18:16, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of OpenLeaks

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on OpenLeaks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:24, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin - the fife pictured was made 1869 on and is not from the Civil War

Kevin - The pictured fife is not from the Civil War. It is from after the Civil War - 1869 on. lease go to www.fifedrum.org/sjbaretsky/cgi-bin/Fifes/Cloos.shtml or to www.fifedrum.org to research this. On the page Welcome to the FifeDrum Historical File Pages, it says that the machinery and methods to make tapered metal ferrules on the ends of fifes did not exist until 1869, well after the Civil War. The tapered ends and metal ferrules on the ends are probably Crosby style flute made by Cloos. The marks, etc. are explained on the mentioned web page. eBay sellers frequently sell these as Civil War, but they are not. No Crosby fife has ever been found, and they were marked W.A. Crosby/Boston. There may be reproductions, though. There is a Crosby fife with these markings at the Library of Congress. The fifes used in the Civil War would have been wood, without the metal bands. Or perhaps some were metal? -Vicki — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justushw (talk • contribs) 16:34, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know if that note got through - fife is not from the Civil War

Kevin - I don't know if that note got through to you. The fife you have pictured on Wikipedia is not from the Civil War, because machinery and methods to make the tapered metal ferrules on the ends was not around until 1869. You can find information on the www.fifedrum.org website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justushw (talk • contribs) 16:38, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Titanic-bow seen from MIR I submersible.jpeg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Titanic-bow seen from MIR I submersible.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:02, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oware sowing.png needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Oware sowing.png appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Kevin Saff}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:32, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oware sowed.png needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Oware sowed.png appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Kevin Saff}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oware captured.png needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Oware captured.png appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Kevin Saff}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:04, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kalah setup.png needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Kalah setup.png appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Kevin Saff}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:05, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kalah sowing1.png needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Kalah sowing1.png appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Kevin Saff}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:35, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kalah sowing2.png needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Kalah sowing2.png appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Kevin Saff}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:36, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kalah sowing3.png needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Kalah sowing3.png appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Kevin Saff}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:36, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What is your interest in the USS Inaugural

My dad was John Pace the Captain of the Inaugural. I was just interested in your post on the ship.

Bob Pace

The_paces@comcast.net — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.49.168.77 (talk) 03:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Palace Of Fine Arts photo inquiry

Hi, I'm writing The Encyclopedia Of Jerry Garcia Music Venues. I'm interested in using this photo. I'd need it at least 1MB. Do you have one larger than what's on here? Please email me at slipnut01@gmail.com.

Thank you Harry Angus — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.7.79.9 (talk) 04:38, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bao setup.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bao setup.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:27, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:01, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kevin Saff. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kevin Saff. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Graphics BBS

The article Graphics BBS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:11, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who like NationStates

Hey! If you're interested, I started a series of userboxes for the game NationStates. Feel free to add any or add your own!-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 04:53, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ünee tugalluulakh

The article Ünee tugalluulakh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Possible hoax or mispelling. No reliable references found in BEFORE, only Wikipedia mirrors and like. Fails WP:GNG and WP:V.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:35, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eson xorgol

The article Eson xorgol has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies)'s section for products requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. I did find some mention in [1] but snippet view prevents me from confirming it is significant and I am not seeing anything else. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eson xorgol for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eson xorgol is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eson xorgol until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:17, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eson xorgol for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eson xorgol is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eson xorgol (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:45, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mancala 2x5

Template:Mancala 2x5 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:25, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fantasy Bedtime Hour

The article Fantasy Bedtime Hour has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:21, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of GBBS

The article GBBS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article with no indication of meeting WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 02:23, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]