Talk:Id, ego and superego

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Id, ego and superego article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of March 19, 2006.

Archives

1

Introduction

The introduction is wrong. Although ego psychologists may draw from "Ego and the Id" (1923) predominantly (I don't even know if this is true), the first release of the structural model of the mind was in his essay "Beyond the Pleasure Principle" (1920). Here is the quote from Peter Gay, a biographer, and editor of 'The Freud Reader', this is from his introduction to the essay "Beyond the Pleasure Principle: "The essay is a difficult text, but as the first statement of the new 'structural' theory of the mind, it is indispensable to an understanding of fundamental shifts in psychoanalytic thinking" (Gay, pp. 594, "The Freud Reader").

Redirection from Structural model

Hello, the redirection of "structural model" to this page is quite surprising. I found the redirection while writing a piece on the different types of computational models in biology, which include for instance models of macromolecule structures, or set of differential equations used in pharmacometrics (also called structural models, to differentiate them from the statistical part of the models). I think we should remove the redirection.Nicolas Gambardella (talk) 15:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Secondary or tertiary references

There is a whole lot of quoting directly from Freud, can't anyone paraphrase him or secondary references? This isn't wikiquote, and the quotes are kind of heavy for an encyclopaedia. For Thors sake, do something. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 20:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural Significance Vs. Scientific

Sorry to come out here as an armchair editor, but my (albeit) limited understanding of 21st century psychology is that many of Freud's theories are not so much scientifically valid or state-of-the-art at all, and are instead culturally significant holdovers that have colored popular perception of psychology. This article gives the immediate impression that these concepts are not out-of-date. I think that there should be clear reference to that, similar to an article about the ancient 'medical humors' concepts and such. In addition, I came here to look for more information about 'id, ego, and superego' as a literary device spouting out of Freud's work, which I think should be mentioned in the article. 2600:8807:5471:6700:CC8B:E0CE:DD85:9095 (talk) 04:17, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to change it. We encourage you to be bold in updating pages, because wikis like ours develop faster when everybody edits. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. You can always preview your edits before you publish them or test them out in the sandbox. If you need additional help, check out our getting started page or ask the friendly folks at the Teahouse. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 13:59, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Ego and Non-Ego" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ego and Non-Ego and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 4 § Ego and Non-Ego until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:59, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 January 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Adumbrativus (talk) 03:46, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Id, ego and super-ego → Id, ego and superego – All you need to do is a quick google to find out it is the WP:COMMONNAME to have it without the apostrophe. In fact, when you search Id, ego and super-ego it auto-corrects to superego (here) because super-ego is simply less used by far. All the top results on Google use superego and it is more popular on Google Trends (here). Listed as a WP:RM as I'm not entirely sure what people's opinions on this will be. JacobTheRox (talk) 14:29, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move. You didn't link the Google Trends data ☹️.. But yes, I see your point. COMMONNAME stands. ( Also, should probably change the wording throughout the article if the move is made). UnexpectedSmoreInquisition aka USI (talk) 16:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My bad; I've linked it now =) JacobTheRox (talk) 07:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! UnexpectedSmoreInquisition aka USI (talk) 12:01, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Psychology has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.