Talk:California State Route 247

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the California State Route 247 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

California State Route 247 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 12, 2015. (Reviewed version).

U.S. Roads: State highways / California Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	California
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Classification

Does anyone know anything about the history of this road? Then the stub could be removed.--Rschen7754 19:34, May 28, 2005 (UTC)

Well, you're an idiot and should have looked at the state law.

--Rs chen 7754 06:29, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:California State Route 247/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 01:18, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
You should indicate that the portion of SR 247 between SR 62 and Lucerne Valley runs through deserts (you do further along in the route description).

" In 2001, Caltrans indicated that most of the highway was considered "maintain only" until 2020", what is "maintain only" supposed to mean? Should clarify here.

It means that it should only be maintained; I think it's clear enough. --Rs chen 7754 01:52, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:

A couple small issues to be addressed, but otherwise good. Will put on hold. Dough4872 01:28, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replied. --Rs chen 7754 01:52, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And I will pass the article. Dough4872 02:03, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]