User talk:T. Baphomet
Good day sir. You have removed some sections from the Samael Aun Weor article which by rights should be there. I have left some comments on the talk page which illuminate this further. Let us perform first a statistical analysis. Which words perhaps occur more than any other in the works of Samael Aun Weor? I would suggest the words 'black magic' may be found to be some of the most frequently occuring. Therefore it is neccessary to explain the Esoteric Antithesis. As for Elemental Magic, Occult Medicine and Practical Magic was Samael's last book, therefore this needs to be explained in a comprehensive manner. I have left on the discussion page for the article some quotes from a pamphlet written by Samael in the last year of his life, which explains in a clear manner the importance of the Social Christ, going as far as to suggest that Gnosis is in fact an organic aspect of the Social Christ, and cannot be regarded as existing apart from this. If you wish to dispute the words of Samael Aun Weor, do so, but you cannot ignore the facts on the very page which is devoted to explaining his doctrine. It would be very easy to create a page on the history of the Gnostic movement explaining in depth every edit made to Samael's books by Glorian publishing with complete referencing? It would be very easy to make such an article. A source which has been proven to lie cannot be regarded as a trustworthy source unless they concretely and publicly demonstrate their repentance for lying.
|
|---|
| 1 |
License tagging for Image:Saw1.gif
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Saw1.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:08, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Difficulties
[edit]I admit that editing on Wikipedia was harder than I thought, at least when it is attempted on "well-guarded" articles. The problem with Samael Aun Weor seems to be that he does not qualify as notable, and much of his material (e.g. that kundalini only can be awakened through white tantra) goes under the WP:FRINGE guideline. And now I see that someone has asked for third-party sources on the Samael Aun Weor article. The only one I know of that talks about his life is El Hombre Absoluto by Oscar Uzcátegui, but I doubt that it counts as a reliable source. So, what do you think? Should we leave the big articles and just focus on creating and editing smaller ones? Anton H 12:45, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia maintenance tasks
[edit]Twinkle is a set of JavaScripts that gives registered users several new options to assist them in common Wikipedia maintenance tasks and to help them deal with acts of vandalism. It provides users three types of rollback functions and includes a full library of speedy deletion functions, user warnings, pseudoautomagical reporting of vandals, and much more.
It has its origins as a reversion script based on ideas found in Voice of All's script collection. It's somewhat in the beta stage, so use it at your own risk
Notes
1.All scripts on this page are only tested on Mozilla Firefox, Opera, Camino, and Safari; they may not work on other browsers. Will not work in IE. 2.If using Windows, ZoneAlarm might break this script. 3.Norton Internet Security (specifically, AntiSpam) will hijack the http stream and append data, with the result that the data is malformed xml (the xml standard requires one root node only), breaking Twinkle. This can be fixed by disabling popup blocking.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:TW
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Samael Aun Weor4.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Samael Aun Weor4.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Image:Samael_Aun_Weor_Meditation.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Samael_Aun_Weor_Meditation.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:06, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Saw1.gif
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Saw1.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:06, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Saw1.gif
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Saw1.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:30, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, T. Baphomet. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)